<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasoning from the Scriptures</title>
	<link>http://worshipintheword.blogsome.com/2006/10/13/reasoning-from-the-scriptures-2/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Radford</title>
		<link>http://worshipintheword.blogsome.com/2006/10/13/reasoning-from-the-scriptures-2/#comment-10</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://worshipintheword.blogsome.com/2006/10/13/reasoning-from-the-scriptures-2/#comment-10</guid>
					<description>Dean,

I think we are onto something here...nice work.

I would like to offer two suggestions

1. As I read through, there was a bit of a disconnect between the exegesis and theological implications. I thought your summary of the chapter was helpful, but when you turned to the implications, it didn't seem like they were coming from the passage you are focussing on. In all but two of the implication, I failed to see a strong connection. The need here may be just for you demonstrate the connection more clearly.

2. I would probably shorten the amount that you post at a time. It took some doing to get through this. However, if you are planning on posting once a month, this isn't as big an issue.

I have a number of other comments that I will send to you via email.

Keep up the good work!

Pete

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dean,</p>
	<p>I think we are onto something here&#8230;nice work.</p>
	<p>I would like to offer two suggestions</p>
	<p>1. As I read through, there was a bit of a disconnect between the exegesis and theological implications. I thought your summary of the chapter was helpful, but when you turned to the implications, it didn&#8217;t seem like they were coming from the passage you are focussing on. In all but two of the implication, I failed to see a strong connection. The need here may be just for you demonstrate the connection more clearly.</p>
	<p>2. I would probably shorten the amount that you post at a time. It took some doing to get through this. However, if you are planning on posting once a month, this isn&#8217;t as big an issue.</p>
	<p>I have a number of other comments that I will send to you via email.</p>
	<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
	<p>Pete
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
